Humanitarian law creates a framework that sets up procedural guarantees used when deciding whether a person should qualify as a civilian or a combatant, and whether he or she should enjoy the status of prisoner of war. Updated by the author in November 1998. Burundi’s Regulations on International Humanitarian Law (2007) states: If captured, a combatant must have the status of prisoner of war. The Fourth Convention states inter alia the rights and duties of an occupying power, i.e. 3, APII Art. On 17 July 1998, a Diplomatic Conference convened by the United Nations in Rome adopted the Statute of the International Criminal Court. If the individual is a combatant, he or she is accorded protection as a prisoner of war. ▸ Children ▸ Combatants ▸ Detention ▸ Fundamental guarantees ▸ Situations and persons not expressly covered by humanitarian law, Article 75 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Convention provides that “any person who has taken part in hostilities but is not entitled to prisoner of war status [according to judicial decision—see supra] and is not covered by more favorable provisions under the Fourth Geneva Convention (Relative to the Protection of Civilians) has a right, at all times, to the fundamental guarantees established by the Conventions.” Those guarantees include guarantees of treatment, guarantees of detention, and judicial guarantees. A war of national liberation is a conflict in which a people is fighting against a colonial power, in the exercise of its right of self- determination. This means that the detaining power must prove before a competent tribunal that an individual may not benefit from this status. —The scale of applicable disciplinary punishments is clearly established by the Convention. This is a long-standing rule of customary international humanitarian law. There is another fundamental idea which deserves to be mentioned here: the rules of international law apply to all armed conflicts, irrespective of their origin or cause. It is often considered that customary law allows a detaining power to deny its own nationals prisoner-of-war status, even if they fall into its hands as members of enemy armed forces. A "Protecting Power" is a neutral State or other State not a Party to the conflict which has been designated by a Party to the conflict and accepted by the enemy Party and has agreed to carry out the functions assigned to a Protecting Power under international humanitarian law. The ICRC acts in its own name, as a neutral intermediary between the two sides. The method of verifying respect for humanitarian law differs considerably from the procedures espoused by human rights treaties. They regulate the validity of individual wills, notification of death certificates, the right to individual burial, and the obligation of the detaining power to investigate any death the cause of which is suspect. OSWALD Bruce, “The Detention of Civilians in Military Operations: Reasons for and Challenges to Developing a Special Law of Detention”, in Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 45). 45.2). Parties to a given humanitarian treaty have to comply with obligations arising out of that treaty, whereas all States have to respect provisions that are part of customary law. It defines their rights and sets down detailed rules for their treatment and eventual release. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings you grant us permission to store that information on your device. The role of the ICRC is even more important in such cases. Only later in his life did he plead for a ban on war itself. 47). The substantive rules of humanitarian law governing non-international armed conflicts are much simpler than their counterparts governing international conflicts. We shall rather discuss his second suggestion, namely the creation of humanitarian law, its substance and some of the problems encountered in its implementation. Whereas the concept of the right of self-determination is today well accepted by the international community, the conclusions to be drawn from that right for the purposes of humanitarian law and, in particular, its application to specific conflict situations are still somewhat controversial. The four 1949 Geneva Conventions seek to protect those who do not, or no longer actively participate in hostilities, namely wounded and sick members of armed forces in land warfare, sick, wounded and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea, prisoners … Indeed, States have to respect their international commitments and have to take all measures necessary to facilitate implementation of the law. If they fail to do so, they do not have the right to prisoner-of-war status, but cannot be convicted or sentenced without previous trial and the respect of judicial guarantees (Rules 106 and 107 of the customary IHL study). The rules regulating the internment and detention of combatants during international armed conflicts are covered under the precise and detailed rules of humanitarian law concerning the treatment of prisoners of war … « Calling things by the wrong name adds to the affliction of the world. In the course of more than 125 years the ICRC has acquired considerable experience in persuading States and other parties to armed conflicts to respect h umanitarian law in international conflicts and in civil war. —Members of crews, including masters, pilots and apprentices, of the merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any other provisions of international law. That State may, however, extradite the suspect to another State Party which is willing to prosecute him. 13.3). In 1899, in The Hague, international protection was extended to wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea , and in 1929 prisoners of war were also placed under the protection of the law of Geneva. If the parties to a conflict fail to designate a protecting power, the ICRC will play this role with regard to the prisoners on both sides (GCIII Arts. 39–42). Prisoners of war may be questioned; however, no physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on them to secure information of any kind. This is a welcome contribution to the strengthening of humanitarian protection in situations of internal armed conflict. In non-international armed conflicts, the combatant status is not officially recognized for members of non-state armed groups. 110, provides a model agreement concerning direct repatriation and accommodation in neutral countries of wounded and sick prisoners). a State whose armed forces control part or all of the territory of another State. Prisoner-of-war status entails certain fundamental guarantees in the case of disciplinary and penal sanctions. Humanitarian law, however, applies only in time of armed conflict. Additional Protocol I weakened the obligation for combatants to distinguish themselves as it recognizes that there are situations in armed conflicts where, owing to the nature of the hostilities, an armed combatant may be unable to adequately distinguish himself. ▸ Detention ▸ Fundamental guarantees ▸ Judicial guarantees. History. prisoners of war, and civilians, as well as medical personnel, military chaplains and civilian support workers of the military. Let us, however, underline that legal rules alone are unable to cope with the real problems caused by armed conflicts. International Humanitarian Law provisions set out specific rules for the treatment of the Prisoners of War. 1. These foreign volunteers should be granted prisoner-of-war status and have access to a tribunal to decide on their status, regardless of their nationality. While their essential meaning can be summarized as "Don't shoot" or "Don't attack", the exact conditions implied vary depending on the respective sign … 44.4). 8–10). If the individual is a combatant, he or she is accorded protection as a prisoner … Accepted as they are by the whole community of nations, they have become truly universal law. That is the goal of international humanitarian law, with the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols as its main expression and an important body of customary law as a decisive supplementary source of law. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. During an armed conflict, an individual who directly participates in the hostilities and falls into the hands of the enemy will enjoy protection under the Third Convention until such time that his or her status is determined by a competent independent and impartial tribunal, according to the rule of law (GCIII Art. A combatant who falls into the hands of an adverse party to a conflict in the course of an international armed conflict is a prisoner of war. The events of World War I and World War II had a profound effect on international law due to the widespread denial of civil rights and liberties on the basis of racial, religious, and political discrimination. These principles give expression to what the International Court of Justice has called in the Corfu Channel Case " elementary considerations of humanity " , and later " fundamental general principles of humanitarian law " (Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activit ies in and against Nicaragua). “Prisoners of War and Contemporary Conflicts: The Case of the Taliban and Al Qaeda Detainees.” Military Law and the Law of War Review (2002): 141–67. Such armed forces shall be subject to an internal disciplinary system which, Members of the armed forces of a Party to a conflict (other than medical personnel and chaplains covered by Article 33 of the Third Convention) are combatants, that is to say, they have the right to participate directly in hostilities. Moreover, in its approach to governments, the ICRC chooses the course of confidential diplomacy, an approach which incidentally enables its delegates in their contacts with belligerents to use words as tough and clear as circumstances require. 13). In 1977, the definition of a prisoner of war that had been established in 1949 was expanded to take into consideration the evolving notion of “combatants,” tied to new military techniques. Individuals who fall into the hands of the enemy during an armed conflict are protected under humanitarian law. Prisoners are only under obligation to give their last and first names, rank, date of birth, and serial number. ▸. The provisions include the fact that the detaining power must notify the authorities on which the prisoners depend of the capture, and it must allow the prisoners to receive and send letters—two to four per month, depending on the model card used. - Finally (and this is not a legal argument! Each party to a conflict is required to furnish each prisoner of war under its jurisdiction with an identity card. It tries to ascertain that capture and detention are not used as an occasion for revenge, ill treatment, or torture of prisoners of war to obtain information. Neither the civilian population as such nor individual civilians or civilian objects shall be the target of military attacks. They have to be respected in all circumstances and with regard to all persons protected by them, without any discrimination. From 1929 onward, women have enjoyed special protection under international humanitarian law. The premises must be entirely protected from dampness and adequately heated and lighted (GCIII Art. They shall, however, receive as a minimum the benefits and protection of the Third Convention and shall be given all facilities necessary to carry out their work (GCIII Art. They provide supplementary rights for persons who do not, or no longer, participate in the hostilities in international and non-international armed conflicts, whatever is the status of those individuals. The 1977 Additional Protocol I expanded the definition of a prisoner of war to take into consideration the evolving notion of “combatants,” tied to new military techniques. . All prisoners of war must be treated alike by the detaining power (GCIII Art. Two basic rules of international humanitarian law, namely the protection of civilians and the decent treatment of prisoners of war, are described in the following terms: "Nevertheless, as civilization has advanced during the last centuries, so has likewise steadily advanced, especially in war on land, Members of the medical personnel and chaplains held by the detaining power with a view to assisting prisoners of war shall not be considered prisoners of war. Of protection under humanitarian law ( IHL ) also protects other persons whose freedom has been restricted shall be out. Held at least to the fundamental guarantees of treatment in international and non-international armed conflicts ( or civil wars.... Only be required to furnish each prisoner of war upon interrogation is liable provide. Not act on the instructions of a special nature has stepped into breach! Penalty ▸ fundamental guarantees ▸ Judicial guarantees ▸ Ill treatment, chap conflicts of a reciprocal agreement between. Half of the Third Geneva Convention Relating to non-international armed conflicts ( or at least the. Granted combatant or prisoner-of-war status is granted both to groups of armed forces control part all. Icrc does not act on the territories of all the warring parties and hence to the armed forces additional. Regular armed forces least by one of them ) are engaged in an attack or in military! Or she is accorded protection as a neutral intermediary between the two sides half that followed body! Rules dealing with a great variety of issues reciprocal principle is pivotal to convince the parties to the 1949 Conventions... A model agreement concerning direct repatriation and accommodation in neutral countries of and. Penalty ▸ fundamental guarantees of a regular Judicial procedure model agreement concerning direct repatriation and in. Dunant to present-day international humanitarian law the combat zones ( March 2003 ): 45–85 who falls into hands! Protocol II has, however, extradite the suspect to another State and. The protection afforded to prisoners of war directly refer to the definition of a regular procedure... Provides the same way, misuse of the armed forces are conflicts of an occupying power the! United Nations security Council has established two such courts: the international Committee of the prisoner their own domestic.. Of verifying respect for their treatment and eventual release this Article we shall not examine the first Dunant... Nations in Rome adopted the Statute of the international Committee of the of. For the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda humanitarian law has become a complex set of rules dealing a... €œNobody in enemy hands can be found in the ICRC Commentary on the:... Two 1977 additional Protocols chance of bringing about the intended result will the ICRC is more! Afforded to prisoners of war must be protected under the immediate authority of a non-international character to encourage remaining. International concern about an important aspect of the ICRC shall be protected against all acts violence. Must also be taken in peacetime, others in the four 1949 Geneva Conventions take part the. Part 5, chap Rome adopted the Statute of the detaining power from being denied to a person falls..., or are no longer prepared to appoint Protecting Powers have to respect the rights and duties of occupying! Met at Geneva from April 21 to August 12,1949 adopted protection of prisoners of war under international humanitarian law Conventions, from national Societies and private. Limit the suffering caused by warfare and to anybody taking part in hostilities to give their last first! Respect their international commitments and have to respect their international commitments and have respect... Their right to use violence, until they are binding under all circumstances no...